Oh, right, the 83M, 249:256. I can't believe I forgot that; after all, it was the old default comma for one of the minas that came up in the 37/47/53-limit thread...Dave Keenan wrote: ↑Sun Aug 01, 2021 4:53 pm I think you have the wrong symbol [representing 83S] for 83. I think it should be DropMinas() =
Prime-factor Sagittal JI notation (one symbol per prime)
-
volleo6144
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Mon May 18, 2020 7:03 am
- Location: Earth
- Contact:
Re: Prime-factor Sagittal JI notation (one symbol per prime)
I'm in college (a CS major), but apparently there's still a decent amount of time to check this out. I wonder if the main page will ever have 59edo changed to green...
-
cmloegcmluin
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1694
- Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2020 3:10 pm
- Location: San Francisco, California, USA
- Real Name: Douglas Blumeyer (he/him/his)
- Contact:
Re: Prime-factor Sagittal JI notation (one symbol per prime)
Okay, I've updated my personal records with the change to the symbol for 47. Thanks for catching that @volleo6144. I haven't worked Prime Factor notation into Sagittal code yet, and none of my educational materials regarding Prime Factor notation, even in WIP state, plan to go any higher than 37, so I think I'm done here for now.