Prime-factor Sagittal JI notation (one symbol per prime)

User avatar
volleo6144
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon May 18, 2020 7:03 am
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: Prime-factor Sagittal JI notation (one symbol per prime)

Post by volleo6144 »

Dave Keenan wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 4:53 pm I think you have the wrong symbol [representing 83S] for 83. I think it should be DropMinas(:``::\!):) = :\!): because whatever comma that is, has a smaller 3-exponent.
Oh, right, the 83M, 249:256. I can't believe I forgot that; after all, it was the old default comma for one of the minas that came up in the 37/47/53-limit thread...
just some guy who can sometimes have a hard time not coming off as condescending (I'm definitely very awkward in public) but can at least acknowledge that that's almost never the intent

and also math, math, math and also CS

User avatar
cmloegmcluin
Site Admin
Posts: 1672
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2020 3:10 pm
Location: San Francisco, California, USA
Real Name: Douglas Blumeyer (he/him/his)
Contact:

Re: Prime-factor Sagittal JI notation (one symbol per prime)

Post by cmloegmcluin »

Okay, I've updated my personal records with the change to the symbol for 47. Thanks for catching that @volleo6144. I haven't worked Prime Factor notation into Sagittal code yet, and none of my educational materials regarding Prime Factor notation, even in WIP state, plan to go any higher than 37, so I think I'm done here for now.

Post Reply