Search found 674 matches

by cmloegcmluin
Sun Mar 29, 2020 4:33 am
Forum: Pronunciation of symbols (Sagispeak)
Topic: "Sagispeak"
Replies: 69
Views: 89088

Re: "Sagispeak"

Sweet, I'm glad you like it! Why not just momo and mimi for double minas and momomo and mimimi for triple minas? Actually I did first consider "momo", "mimi", "momomo", and "mimimi", but I thought that the use of the "a"s and the "h"s had a...
by cmloegcmluin
Sat Mar 28, 2020 1:08 pm
Forum: Just Intonation notations
Topic: Prime-factor Sagittal JI notation (one symbol per prime)
Replies: 51
Views: 59976

Re: Prime-factor Sagittal JI notation (one symbol per prime)

I suggest giving the full monzo, but bolding the 3-exponent, and eliding strings of more than 3 zeros. i.e. every prime after 13 looks like [ n m ... 1 >. Something like this then: 5 80/81 [ 4 -4 1 0 0 > 7 63/64 [ -6 2 0 1 0 > 11 33/32 [ -5 1 0 0 1 > 13 26/27 [ 1 -3 ... 1 > 17 4131/4096 [ -12 5 ......
by cmloegcmluin
Sat Mar 28, 2020 12:58 pm
Forum: Pronunciation of symbols (Sagispeak)
Topic: "Sagispeak"
Replies: 69
Views: 89088

Re: "Sagispeak"

I wonder if we should instead consider giving the the schisma diacritics a consonant (e.g. m or b) and no consonant for the minas Aw, man! If reexamining the schisma and schisminas is on the table, we can have some fun... or claw back a consonant from the many allowed for "j" (as you poin...
by cmloegcmluin
Sat Mar 28, 2020 2:31 am
Forum: Just Intonation notations
Topic: Prime-factor Sagittal JI notation (one symbol per prime)
Replies: 51
Views: 59976

Re: Prime-factor Sagittal JI notation (one symbol per prime)

No. If you're willing to choose any of C G D A E to notate your 1/1, there's no reason to go outside of the range 400 Hz to 480 Hz for 1/1. That's ±10%. That's because the largest step between those nominals is a Pythagorean minor third (A:C or E:G), which is 27:32 = 1.185, and 480/400 = 1.2. You s...
by cmloegcmluin
Sat Mar 28, 2020 12:36 am
Forum: Pronunciation of symbols (Sagispeak)
Topic: "Sagispeak"
Replies: 69
Views: 89088

Re: "Sagispeak"

:lol:

Okay, but Magratheans are out of scope for now...

What did you think of my more serious proposal to use apostrophes to break double vowels, e.g. "mo'ovai" for :,::.::/|\:

And of adding “sch” to the table for German “sh” sound, as long as we’re adding “tsh” for French “ch” sound.
by cmloegcmluin
Fri Mar 27, 2020 6:24 am
Forum: Pronunciation of symbols (Sagispeak)
Topic: "Sagispeak"
Replies: 69
Views: 89088

Re: "Sagispeak"

Okay, it turns out I've got a little chunk of time before I have to get back to my day job, so while it's fresh in my head I'll try to dump this back out: It's a shame that ambiguous "j" sucks up so many consonant sounds. What if we start using vowel sounds? "ei" and "eo&quo...
by cmloegcmluin
Fri Mar 27, 2020 6:00 am
Forum: Pronunciation of symbols (Sagispeak)
Topic: "Sagispeak"
Replies: 69
Views: 89088

Re: "Sagispeak"

However, since in Sagispeak the consonants always appear before an "a", and in these contexts "c" always makes /k/, it's not an issue. An interesting point. I wasn't aware of that rule. I agree it checks out. Does it apply in languages other than English, that use the Latin alph...
by cmloegcmluin
Fri Mar 27, 2020 1:32 am
Forum: Pronunciation of symbols (Sagispeak)
Topic: "Sagispeak"
Replies: 69
Views: 89088

Re: "Sagispeak"

Ah ha! So that's what the hexadecimal character code was about. Well, I've gone over this thread and I have to say I'm a big fan of Sagispeak. The only thing I might like to change is the use of "k" as opposed to "c". Generally I prefer "k" because its less ambiguous, a...
by cmloegcmluin
Thu Mar 26, 2020 10:32 am
Forum: Pronunciation of symbols (Sagispeak)
Topic: "Sagispeak"
Replies: 69
Views: 89088

Re: "Sagispeak"

Yes, it is. Note that we no longer use any "extended ASCII" characters, so there is no longer a short version for anything outside the Athenian single-shaft set. Sorry, what are the "extended ASCII" characters? I assumed they'd be in the Character Map but I'm not finding them. M...
by cmloegcmluin
Thu Mar 26, 2020 6:02 am
Forum: Pronunciation of symbols (Sagispeak)
Topic: "Sagispeak"
Replies: 69
Views: 89088

Re: "Sagispeak"

Is the "Plain text shorthand" here an update to the "Mixed short ASCII representation" that appears in the outdated Sagittal-2 Character map ? I don't understand the application for either. The long-ASCII form requires more characters but is so intuitive. Anecdotally, I have yet ...