I wonder if Scott is has considered the consistency of their JI approximations. When you look at that, neither of those divisions is particularly remarkable, compared to others in the vicinity, such as 94, 111 and 121.
Strictly-speaking 103edo isn't even 1,3,9-consistent, meaning that, as a chain of fifths, C : G : D is not it's best approximation of 1:3:9, although that can be repaired by stretching its octave by 0.2 to 1.9 cents, when its integer consistency limit becomes 15. 113 edo has an integer consistency limit of 14 (which doesn't increase with any stretch or compression of the octave).
A notation for 113edo is straightforward:
=10. An alternative would be
In the case of 103edo we have:
=8. But 2 degrees is difficult.
2 degrees of 103edo could be
but their untempered size is very small, and less than
. 2 degrees of 103edo could also be
, which has the opposite problem, but I prefer it for the obviousness of