A proposal to simplify the notation of EDOs with bad fifths

User avatar
volleo6144
Posts: 58
Joined: Mon May 18, 2020 7:03 am
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: A proposal to simplify the notation of EDOs with bad fifths

Post by volleo6144 »

Dave Keenan wrote:
Wed Sep 30, 2020 10:54 am
That shows up nicely, the cases where we will have to deal with overlaps. In the final product, I think we should always have the "b" EDO as the one that is partly obscured.
Yeah, it's just that the order I ended up having it draw the boxes was 5, 6, 7, 8, ..., 59, 60, 61, ..., 71, 72, and then all the b-edos in order... and drawing a box overlapping another box is obviously going to just get rid of that part of the other box. (See also how overlaps worked in my other tables.)
A random guy who sometimes doodles about Sagittal and microtonal music in general in his free time.

Post Reply